[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”5px|||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”4.24.2″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” width=”97%” max_width=”97%” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text” _builder_version=”4.24.2″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|0px|||false|false” custom_padding=”|0px||0px|false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
Reading Time: <\/span> < 1<\/span> minute<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n The legal representative of EFF leader Julius Malema is set to cross-examine Dr. Karlien van den Berg, a linguist at the University of the North West at the Equality Court today. Van den Berg concluded that Malema\u2019s utterances during the October 2022 EFF conference in Cape Town amounted to hate speech and incitement to violence.<\/p>\n The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) had also made a similar ruling, ordering Malema to retract and apologise which he failed to do.<\/p>\n Van den Berg testified that it is unlikely that his words could be interpreted in any other way.<\/p>\n \u201cThe utterances there display various characteristics of hate speech but very specifically, incitement to violence, propagation of hate-based race and gender, consequently that\u2019s my expert opinion that the average reasonable person will interpret the utterances as a deliberate incitement to violence and propagation of hate,\u201d says Van den Berg.<\/p>\n One of the statements by Malema, \u201cYou must never be scared to kill. A revolution demands that at some point there must be killing because the killing is part of a revolutionary act,\u201d was particularly highlighted by the SAHRC.<\/p>\n The commission\u2019s chairperson, Bongani Majola, addressed the media expressing disappointment that the EFF and its leader refused to withdraw the statements.<\/p>\n Majola stated, \u201cAlso, the danger exists that people might then start attacking white people whom they perceive to be racists.\u201d<\/p>\n Majola also said that Malema\u2019s claim of being denied the opportunity to defend himself was premature, as he was likely to have the chance when the matter is heard in the Equality Court.<\/p>\n SAHRC gives Julius Malema and EFF 10 days to apologise for inciteful remarks: